From incandescent's dim glow
To halogen's efficient brightness
And now LED's blinding rays
We still cannot see clearly
All that we want in the darkness
#MastoPrompt - halogen
From incandescent's dim glow
To halogen's efficient brightness
And now LED's blinding rays
We still cannot see clearly
All that we want in the darkness
#MastoPrompt - halogen
Susan Schneider on Chatbot Epistemology in Social Epistemology journal, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691728.2025.2500030?af=R#abstract
Michael Huemer comments in SERRC, https://social-epistemology.com/2025/07/04/comments-on-chatbot-epistemology-michael-huemer/
“I write because I don't know what I think until I read what I say."
- Flannery O'Connor
Tried to switch an LLM flow to gemini-2.5-flash today, which came out yesterday. It seems Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes ignores the thinking budget I set! Flow is failing because the model ignores my thinking budget of 0, starts generating thinking tokens, and immediately goes over the max_tokens limit.
Apparently this was also a Heisen-bug in the preview version: https://github.com/google-gemini/cookbook/issues/722
“Only 20% of the chatbot group could remember a quote from their own essay. Shown their own essay afterwards, 16% of the chatbot group denied it was theirs.
That shouldn’t be surprising — if you’re not doing the work, you won’t remember the work.“
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/16/bad-brainwaves-chatgpt-makes-you-stupid/
https://www.alojapan.com/1298203/japan-cant-export-cool-without-strategic-thinking/ Japan can’t export cool without strategic thinking #can't #cool #Export #Japan #JapanNews #JapanTopics #news #strategic #thinking Douglas Montgomery is CEO of Global Connects Media and an adjunct professor at Temple University Japan. In the world of pop culture, few stories are as remarkable — or instructive — as the rise of the “Korean wave,” or hallyu. Over the past two decades, South Korea has transformed itself from a modest exporte…
Mistral AI lancia Magistral, il suo primo modello di ragionamento step by step
https://gomoot.com/mistral-ai-lancia-magistral-il-suo-primo-modello-di-ragionamento-step-by-step/
I Don’t Teach Beliefs. I Teach Mechanisms.
Beliefs divide. Systems build.
You don’t need more opinion. You need architecture. I don’t tell you what to think. I help you see how thought moves.
#systems #thinking #philosophy #structure #learning
→ https://bereznev.gumroad.com/l/insider
P.S. Made by a madman — Kirill Bereznev
https://bereznev.gumroad.com/l/insider
También:
“They are not emotionally intelligent or smart in any meaningful or recognizably human sense of the word. LLMs are impressive probability gadgets that have been fed nearly the entire internet, and produce writing not by thinking but by making statistically informed guesses about which lexical item is likely to follow another.”
“It is not easy to describe things here. It is a life of unreality. … Reflection withers. … There seems to be no place at all for real thought. … Every day I say to myself: Patience, just be patient. Don’t be discouraged, no matter what. If we do what we can, the rewarding moments are bound to return.”
#KarlJaspers, writing from Germany, in a letter to #HannahArendt, 12 March 1946.
Seeking reason for #hope, wherever I can find it @bookstodon #patience #politics #thinking
Nice blog by Gary Marcus, for me personally this is not a blow, I don't see current AI as reasoning or thinking, it still will have enormous impact without these capabilities.
Also it's fascinating that models are able to solve some difficult math problems (that are not in their trainingset ) while they fail with seemingly simple other problems.
https://open.substack.com/pub/garymarcus/p/a-knockout-blow-for-llms?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
#ai #llm #reasoning #thinking
Pithy thoughts on thinking by dustin curtis
I have been stuck. Every time I sit down to write a blog post, code a feature, or start a project, I come to the same realization: in the context of AI, what I’m doing is a waste of time. It’s horrifying. The fun has been sucked out of the process of creation because nothing I make organically can compete with what AI already produces—or soon will. All of my original thoughts feel like early drafts of better, more complete thoughts that simply haven’t yet formed inside an LLM.
I thought I was using AI in an incredibly positive and healthy way, as a bicycle for my mind and a way to vastly increase my thinking capacity. But LLMs are insidious–using them to explore ideas feels like work, but it’s not real work. Developing a prompt is like scrolling Netflix, and reading the output is like watching a TV show. Intellectual rigor comes from the journey: the dead ends, the uncertainty, and the internal debate. Skip that, and you might still get the insight–but you’ll have lost the infrastructure for meaningful understanding. Learning by reading LLM output is cheap. Real exercise for your mind comes from building the output yourself.
Some of these resonate. I’ve also been using LLMs since the GPT3 days and following them since the GPT2 days. I remember suggesting GPT 2 as a path forward to a friend who was trying to build a classifier for their project.
I am not as worried as dustin even if the thoughts resonate with me. The value from thinking, from mulling, from iterating, from compounding had two parts – internal satisfaction and external validation (when you broadcasted the thoughts with others). There was a time where the sheer act of broadcasting earned you an audience – because not enough people shared.
We’ve gone the other end of the spectrum now with everyone sharing most of their thoughts and it’s only getting wilder. It’s time to dig back into the internal satisfaction of the thinking. The past year was revelatory in how I understand myself and the past few weeks of output in this blog has increased primarily as a result of focusing on the internal validation and satisfaction.
To me AIs are just another tool, just like Google, the internet and it’s an incredible summarizer of the collective human thought. It’s still not a particularly tasteful one and it’s certainly not an original one (even if it might seem to original to you and others as you certainly don’t know the vast collection of human knowledge that’s available). However, it’s still a tool. It’s a useful one too.
I appreciate digging into the existentialism it sometimes brings out in people and I appreciate dustin bravely sharing his. However, stick to the internal validators, and you will also leverage to make it satisfy you.
On thinking and benzene
This post resonated with me. In a tiny way, I am skeptical about it given how much I found myself agreeing with it. These are the ways I think. I will wait until you go finish reading.
Go. Do it. Now.
When you are back, you can read through the parts that just makes sense.
Disclaimer: The post argues that, by definition, LLMs cannot think. I mathematically agree with this. However, I will also be the first to admit that I am not the expert to define what thinking is.
I am very interested to know and debate if we land on LLMs thinking or not. However, this post is to expand and explore how humans think. I really liked the four parts of thinking that was highlighted in the post:
Thinking in silence;
Thinking through inspiration;
Thinking by writing;
Thinking by not (actively) thinking.
I think they do a great job of highlighting the various parts of thinking as a process. However, each process is best at doing something slightly different. I break the job down as follows:
To be clear, I believe the author has hit the various ways in which you empower and encourage thinking accurately. I just wanted to call out that there are different parts of that process that might be encouraged by each of the rituals.
Finally, your brain does something incredibly powerful. I’ve never yet seen this happen by LLMs.
This is thinking by not thinking. It is passive. It happens without you forcing it, in the subconscious, while you do other things. I don’t know why it happens. I don’t understand what processes run in our subconscious mind in the background, I only know that I’ve experienced this before.
I always think back to the (apocryphal) story of the benzene ring structure. Put me in as a believer because it’s happened to me multiple times.
“AI is wonderful, except for the fact that it’s destroying #media, #education, the #environment, #music, the #arts, public trust, #thinking skills, and everybody’s job.” – Ted Gioia
#AI #GenAI #education #technology #capitalism #employment #jobs
https://www.honest-broker.com/p/a-major-newspaper-publishes-a-summer
"People will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think."
- Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)
"It’s reasonable to ask whether, as A.I. proliferates, many people won’t begin to question the value of training their own minds when computers are already so well trained. And it’s also unclear how intellectual passivity in some domains might affect our performance in others. In my life, I’ve given two best-man speeches; at the time I gave them, I was nervous (who wouldn’t be?). If A.I. had existed then, I might have at least considered asking for its help. Let’s say I resisted the temptation—but let’s also imagine that I had already employed A.I. extensively on other kinds of writing, using it to compose my e-mails and craft my presentations. Would I still have been able to write the speeches that I ended up writing? Or would my over-all capability as a writer have stagnated or declined?
It feels strange to imagine that, someday soon, we might need to start reminding ourselves to think. But that’s what artificial intelligence does—it thinks—and, in many contexts, promises to do the thinking for us. In a world saturated with technology, we already have to remind ourselves to put down our phones; to go outside; to see friends in person; to go places instead of staring at them on our screens; to have non-technological experiences, such as boredom. If we’re not careful, then our minds will do less as computers do more, and we will be diminished as a result."
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/open-questions/why-even-try-if-you-have-ai