eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

218
active users

#generativeAI

106 posts82 participants6 posts today

🧠 #NotebookLM, finalmente, attiva la condivisione dei notebook. 

👉 I dettagli: linkedin.com/posts/alessiopoma

___ 

✉️ 𝗦𝗲 𝘃𝘂𝗼𝗶 𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗴𝗴𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼/𝗮 𝘀𝘂 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗲, 𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗶 𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝗺𝗶𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿: bit.ly/newsletter-alessiopomar 

*sigh* GEO is the new SEO.

AI hype take: how to write content so good that *your* voice gets to be the authoritative one when people use AI for search and research.

Cynical take: how to write content so good that the large language models steal *your* words instead of someone else's. (Just kidding, they're stealing everyone's words.)

studioid.com/springboard/how-t

studioID · Grasping GEO: How to Optimize Your Content to Appear in GenAI ResponsesLearn how to achieve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to get your content cited in responses via LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and more.

How do you trust AI when it extracts data from documents?

That’s been one of the biggest blockers to using AI in high-stakes business settings. If you can’t trace where the information came from… it’s hard to rely on it.

💥 Enter LlamaExtract — a new tool from LlamaIndex that extracts data with citations.

Now when AI pulls out key insights from a document, you can see exactly where it came from.

Read more here: llamaindex.ai/blog/get-citatio

www.llamaindex.aiGet Citations and Reasoning for Extracted Data in LlamaExtract — LlamaIndex - Build Knowledge Assistants over your Enterprise DataLlamaIndex is a simple, flexible framework for building knowledge assistants using LLMs connected to your enterprise data.

"While generative AI and AI agents are the buzzwords that splash across the headlines, the same dynamics are true of precursors to contemporary AI systems like automated decision-making technologies used in banking, hiring, and criminal justice
(...)
More than a decade of evidence demonstrates how it goes: The introduction of these systems concentrates power among the deployers of the tech, leaving those on the receiving end more insecure, vulnerable, and unable to contest the determinations made by the “smart machine” at the expense of the broader public. These tools are often invisible to those judged by them, and inscrutable even when they are visible.

Why society would ever accept this bargain is the critical question at hand. Amid the excitement over AI’s (speculative) potential, the sobering reality of its present and recent past is obscured. When we consult the record on how AI is already intermediating critical social infrastructures, we see that it is materially reshaping our institutions in ways that ratchet up inequality, render institutions opaque to those they are meant to serve, and concentrate power in the hands of the already powerful. (...) It makes clear that for all the whiz-bang demos and bold Davos proclamations, on the ground AI is consistently deployed in ways that make everyday people’s lives, material conditions, and access to opportunities worse and the systems that incorporate them stronger.

This report’s title, Artificial Power, captures the critical, and at times contradictory, moment we find ourselves in. On one hand, the tech oligarchy has successfully deployed “AI”—as a strategic marketing term and as a set of automation technologies—to cement and grow its power. At the same time, this power is vastly inflated, contingent, and poised for disruption."

ainowinstitute.org/publication

AI Now Institute · Executive SummaryThose of us broadly engaged in challenging corporate consolidation, economic injustice, tech oligarchy, and rising authoritarianism need to contend with the AI industry or we will lose the end game. Accepting the current trajectory of AI proselytized by Big Tech and its stenographers as “inevitable” is setting us up on a path to an unenviable […]

"“A Million Colors” by Vinih Pray has become the first-known AI-generated song to hit the TikTok charts. Currently sitting at No. 44 on the TikTok Viral 50, the doo-wop inspired song was generated using the popular AI music platform Suno, the company has confirmed.

While this marks the first AI-generated song to hit the TikTok charts, there was one previous song on the TikTok charts that was human-made but contained an AI-generated sample. In the summer of 2024, “U My Everything” by Sexyy Redd, featuring Drake — which sampled the AI-generated song “BBL Drizzy” — peaked at No. 2 on the TikTok Top 50, but the most common sound clip used from “U My Everything” did not feature that sample.

With over 371,700 creates on TikTok, 819,745 streams on Spotify, 161,000 views on YouTube, “A Million Colors” sounds so realistic that it has fooled a number of unsuspecting users. One of the most popular celebrities on the platform, Kylie Jenner, recently posted a makeup tutorial with the AI-generated song in the background, earning her 1.5 million likes.

Some TikTok users, however, have started catching on. On “A Million Colors” sound page, a number of videos are being made by users to call out its use of AI. This likely traces back to a popular video by @americangorls, who wrote in a post on May 10 “this song having hundreds of thousands of uses and I haven’t seen anyone talking ab the fact that this is 100% ai is freaking me out a little. am i crazy[?]”"

billboard.com/pro/million-colo

A Million Colors
Billboard · ‘A Million Colors’ by Vinih Pray Becomes First-Known AI-Generated Song on the TikTok ChartsBy Kristin Robinson

Jonathan Vanian and Ashley Capoot reveal Reddit's bold move against AI startup Anthropic. The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco, accuses Anthropic of unlawfully using user data for AI training, harming Reddit's business. Unlike partners OpenAI and Google, Reddit demands compliance with data regulations. This case emphasizes the importance of protecting user content from exploitation. Read more about this legal battle here: cnbc.com/2025/06/04/reddit-ant #Reddit #Anthropic #AILawsuit #GenerativeAI #DataPrivacy

CNBCReddit sues AI startup Anthropic for breach of contract, 'unfair competition'
Continued thread

I don't think that if the author would want to sue the person making the fake Calvin and Hobbes comic, the "but your honor, I gave a prompt to the tool that explicitly orders it to make content that infringes on copyright, so it is not my fault but OpenAI's!"'

Just because a tool makes it easy for you to make copyright infringing stuff, it doesn't absolve you from making it.