eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

225
active users

#smtp

6 posts2 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

🧵 2/5 Further, the “native” connection to EWS/OWA within Thunderbird is only available in 140 when you enable a custom setting (search for “ews”). What you see in the new Account Hub will depend on whether that custom setting is enabled.

Replied in thread

🧵 5/5 TbSync was a small challenge because, as has happened in the past with major Thunderbird updates, it was declared unsupported and automatically disabled by Thunderbird 140esr. Following the instructions in github.com/jobisoft/TbSync/iss (file-based reinstall of TbSync and EAS-4-TbSync) resolves the issue for now.

Apparently TB-Sync does not work with Thunderbird 140.0. Is an update planned? I would be very thankful!
GitHubTB-Sync does not work with TB 140.0 ? · Issue #753 · jobisoft/TbSyncBy Thunderfan1980
Replied in thread

🧵 3/5 Right now, Exchange requires add-ons to work. Usually this means TbSync or OWL. Each of these has its own set of features and limitations to consider. Account Hub will show you Exchange in two flavors… one says “add-on required” and the other doesn’t. It’s the latter one that is the native integration in experimental form at this time (and does email ONLY for now).

Replied in thread

🧵 4/5 Until now, I have been using IMAP+SMTP, and TbSync for address books and calendars. After going through a few iterations, I have now settled on using Exchange (native, experimental) accounts (yes, plural) for email and sticking with TbSync for calendars and address books.

For a brief moment in time, #mutt was the perfect #email program for me, I had it configured just right, it really took email work off my hands. I tried it again many years ago, maybe with mutt-ng, but I remember configuring it was a nightmare, especially with several #IMAP servers, using different #SMTP.s for different accounts, automatically detecting and switching sender addresses, etc.
Any chance anyone has a suggestion how I should approach this to substitute Thunderbird at least partly?

#tfw You have to email a government agency, explain in excruciating detail why your mail server (and any other that enforces #DMARC) can't receive certain emails they're sending that fail their DMARC policy, and then cross your fingers and pray that the tier 1 customer service rep who reads your email forwards it to someone who can fix the problem AND said someone actually takes the time to do it. *sigh*
#smtp #SysAdmin #MailAdmin

Remember the threads¹² about #LetsEncrypt removing a crucial key usage from certificates issued by them in predictive obedience to their premium sponsor Google?

We were at first concerned about #SMTP. While I had lived through this problem with #StartSSL by #StartCom back in 2011, I only had a vague recollection of Jabber but recalled in detail that it broke server-to-server SMTP verification (whether the receiving server acted on it or just documented it).

Well, turns out someone now reported that it indeed breaks #XMPP entirely: https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/do-not-remove-tls-client-auth-eku/237427/66

This means that it will soon no longer be possible at all to operate Jabber (XMPP) servers because the servers use the operating system’s CA certificate bundle for verification, which generally follows the major browsers’ root stores, which has requirements from the CA/Browser forum who apparently don’t care about anything else than the webbrowser, and so no CA whose root certificate is in that store will be allowed to issue certificates suitable for Jabber/XMPP server-to-server communication while these CAs are the only ones trusted by those servers.

So, yes, Google’s requirement change is after all breaking Jabber entirely. Ein Schelm, wer Böses dabei denkt.

While https://nerdcert.eu/ by @jwildeboer would in theory help, it’s not existent yet, and there’s not just the question of when it will be included in operating systems’ root CA stores but whether it will be included in them at all.

Google’s policy has no listed contact point, and the CA/B forum isn’t something mere mortals can complain to, so I’d appreciate if someone who can, and who has significant skills to argument this in English and is willing to, to bring it to them.

① mine: https://toot.mirbsd.org/@mirabilos/statuses/01JV8MDA4P895KK6F91SV7WET8
② jwildeboer’s: https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/114516238307785904

Let's Encrypt Community Support · Do *NOT* remove TLS Client Auth EKU!I was also bit by this. I switched to tlsserver profile, and when my XMPP certificate got renewed today, it failed to make any S2S connections :(. I'd to revert to classic profile. Could we please keep TLS client auth EKU ? Thanks!
As of today, #gmail seems to be rejecting all emails from my server because of its "low reputation". All MX tools online say my server is OK (SPF, DMARC), my IP isn't in any blacklist, and I already have set up the TXT DNS records for Google's Postmaster.

Any idea on how to proceed?

These big providers are a PITA for self hosters 🤬

#smtp #spam #mx #FediHelp #selfhosting
Replied in thread

@timixretroplays yikes...

Tho granted all #Freemailers are shit and some like web.de & gmx.de do force people to login on their website so their accounts don't get wiped.

  • They also do the dick move of disabling #IMAP & #SMTP per default (at leadt they don't paywall it like @protonprivacy does!)

Personally I use #aliases & forwarder for inbound eMails.

web.deWEB.DE - kostenlose E-Mail-Adresse, FreeMail & NachrichtenSichere Kommunikation, aktuelle Nachrichten und nützliche Online-Services - alles an einem Ort. Einfach, kostenlos und zuverlässig.

#AskFedi #Email

Is it possible to configure #Gmail (web client) to send an email “from” an alias on a domain that I own, like alias@example.com, but using Gmail’s own #SMTP server, because I don’t have my own SMTP service for example.com?

Yes, I know that’s ripe for spam abuse. But Gmail docs are not clear on this. And I can verify that I control the alias and the domain.

This is for occasional one-off low-volume sends (eg not ongoing email marketing or newsletter).

Thanks!