eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

238
active users

#ResearchIntegrity

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Debunking Risks of Coliforms in Bottled Water

Today I received an e-mail from an industry partner from around two decades ago, kindly alerting me to this paper: 'Fluorescence characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in bottled drinking water of different countries: A potential risk to public health'. It was just published in Water Environment Research by researchers from Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh and Southern Cross University, Australia.....

#academia #researchintegrity #bottledwater #water

andy-baker.org/2025/04/09/debu

Andy Baker · Debunking Risks of Coliforms in Bottled Water
More from Andy Baker

I wrote an article for The Conversation this week with @LucyMontgomery_ and Karl Huang. We discuss the tension between for-profit publishing and research integrity.

"As the academic ecosystem continues to evolve, we will need publishing models that can adapt to the changes and needs of the research community and beyond."

theconversation.com/academic-p

The ConversationAcademic publishing is a multibillion-dollar industry. It’s not always good for scienceSome academic publishers have been accused by scientists of being “too greedy” and prioritising profit over research integrity.

The Dutch Network for #ResearchIntegrity is hosting a keynote and panel discussion on reforms in #recognitionrewards in #Maastricht on 9 April 2025 and registrations are still open! This topic ties in with current debates about budget cuts and changing priorities in #HigherEducation more generally, so we hope that many more people sign up! Everyone is welcome --- including visitors from outside academia and outside UM.

nrin.nl/nrin-on-tour-2025/

nrin.nlNRIN-on-Tour 2025 – Netherlands Research Integrity Network

As a PhD student, you will try to publish your work in peer reviewed academic journals. But how does peer review work? What things do you have to do, what can you do, and what should you not do? Here are some meta science insights on peer review in science. renebekkers.wordpress.com/peer

I hope this is helpful! Do you miss anything? Let me know.

Rene Bekkers · Peer reviewAs a PhD student, you will try to publish your work in peer reviewed academic journals. This page describes how peer review generally works. a. Authors prepare a manuscript for submission To begin …

📢 #Scientometric indicators in #research evaluation and research #misconduct: analysis of the Russian #university excellence initiative

👉 "The results showed that #RUEI #universities had a significantly higher number of retracted #publications in #WoS - and #Scopus -indexed #journals, suggesting that pressure to meet quantitative scientometric #indicators may have encouraged unethical research practices and #researchmisconduct."

link.springer.com/article/10.1

SpringerLinkScientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct: analysis of the Russian university excellence initiative - ScientometricsThis study aimed to examine the impact of the Russian University Excellence Initiative (RUEI), also known as Project 5–100, on research misconduct in Russian higher education. Launched in 2013, the RUEI incentivized universities to increase the number of publications in internationally indexed journals. The analysis compares the prevalence of retracted publications—as a proxy for research misconduct—between universities that participated in the RUEI and a control group of universities that did not. A total of 2621 retracted papers affiliated with at least one Russian institution were identified. Of which 203 papers were indexed in Web of Science (WoS) and/or Scopus databases. The results showed that RUEI universities had a significantly higher number of retracted publications in WoS- and Scopus-indexed journals, suggesting that pressure to meet quantitative scientometric indicators may have encouraged unethical research practices and research misconduct. In addition, different reasons for retraction were found between publications indexed and not indexed in WoS and/or Scopus databases. These findings suggest that the direct and irresponsible use of scientometric indicators as performance measures may have unintended negative consequences that may undermine research integrity.
Replied in thread

9/ Sponsor Bias: Commissioned by the Claims Conference, an organization dedicated to Holocaust remembrance, there's a risk that the wording of questions or interpretation of results could be influenced by specific objectives. While this doesn't invalidate the study, it's crucial to consider this potential bias when analyzing the findings. #SponsorBias #ResearchIntegrity

What could #metascience learn from #criminology for the prevention of #researchmisconduct and #researchintegrity violations? In a seminar at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), I discussed with researchers in criminology how theories and findings from the field may be applied in the field of meta research.
Blog: renebekkers.wordpress.com/2025
Slides: renebekkers.wordpress.com/wp-c
#peerreview