eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

238
active users

#ResearchMisconduct

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
JEG<p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00676-1" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-025</span><span class="invisible">-00676-1</span></a><br>There's a correlation between sexual <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/misconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>misconduct</span></a> accusations and a drop in citations for the scholars accused, while that's not the case for fraudsters. In both cases there is a drop in publications, and the puzzling thing is that - looking at the raw data in the original paper <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317736" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0</span><span class="invisible">317736</span></a> - the trend seems to begin before the accusations emerge. It raises the question of in which direction does the causality go.<br><a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/ResearchMisconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchMisconduct</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/SexualHarassment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SexualHarassment</span></a></p>
François Renaville 🇺🇦🇪🇺<p>📢 <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Scientometric" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Scientometric</span></a> indicators in <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a> evaluation and research <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/misconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>misconduct</span></a>: analysis of the Russian <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>university</span></a> excellence initiative</p><p>👉 "The results showed that <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/RUEI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RUEI</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/universities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>universities</span></a> had a significantly higher number of retracted <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/publications" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>publications</span></a> in <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/WoS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WoS</span></a> - and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Scopus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Scopus</span></a> -indexed <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/journals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>journals</span></a>, suggesting that pressure to meet quantitative scientometric <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/indicators" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>indicators</span></a> may have encouraged unethical research practices and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/researchmisconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>researchmisconduct</span></a>."</p><p><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-025-05269-3" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/article/10.1</span><span class="invisible">007/s11192-025-05269-3</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/retractions" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>retractions</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/researchintegrity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>researchintegrity</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Russia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Russia</span></a></p>
renebekkers<p>What could <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> learn from <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/criminology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>criminology</span></a> for the prevention of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/researchmisconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>researchmisconduct</span></a> and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/researchintegrity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>researchintegrity</span></a> violations? In a seminar at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), I discussed with researchers in criminology how theories and findings from the field may be applied in the field of meta research. <br>Blog: <a href="https://renebekkers.wordpress.com/2025/01/24/how-can-criminology-help-reduce-research-integrity-violations/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">renebekkers.wordpress.com/2025</span><span class="invisible">/01/24/how-can-criminology-help-reduce-research-integrity-violations/</span></a> <br>Slides: <a href="https://renebekkers.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/how-can-criminology-help-reduce-research-integrity-violations.pptx" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">renebekkers.wordpress.com/wp-c</span><span class="invisible">ontent/uploads/2025/01/how-can-criminology-help-reduce-research-integrity-violations.pptx</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a></p>
Matt Hodgkinson<p>"So is there anything that can be done to challenge wrongdoing without crashing out over the cliff? A major point made by Elliott is that whistleblowers should not go it alone: that way madness lies." - <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@deevybee" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>deevybee</span></a></span> </p><p>Dorothy Bishop reviews Carl Elliott's book, The Occasional Human Sacrifice: Medical Experimentation and the Price of Saying No.</p><p><a href="https://deevybee.blogspot.com/2024/07/whistleblowing-research-misconduct-and.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">deevybee.blogspot.com/2024/07/</span><span class="invisible">whistleblowing-research-misconduct-and.html</span></a></p><p><a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/Whistleblowing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Whistleblowing</span></a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ResearchMisconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchMisconduct</span></a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ScientificMisconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ScientificMisconduct</span></a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ResearchEthics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchEthics</span></a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/CarlElliott" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CarlElliott</span></a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/DorothyBishop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DorothyBishop</span></a></p>
renebekkers<p>Finally, it happened: someone threw me into the realm of AI hallucinations. Two papers posted on Research Gate, with identical versions posted on the SSRN, linked to an account at the School of Economics, Finance &amp; Banking (SEFB) of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), include hallucinated references to non-existent publications listed under my name. </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ChatGPT</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/hallucinations" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>hallucinations</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/researchmisconduct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>researchmisconduct</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/DOI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DOI</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/references" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>references</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/academicwriting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>academicwriting</span></a></p>