eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

224
active users

#rocm

1 post1 participant0 posts today
Profile13115<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@eugenialoli" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>eugenialoli</span></a></span> same with photo <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/raw" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>raw</span></a> processing, non of the <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/foss" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>foss</span></a> apps use the color profiles of the cameras, no 16bit raw and many other issues. I gave up retouch due to the still bad gimp ux and the bad implementation of non destructive editing. </p><p>The sad reality is the <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/linuxdesktop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>linuxdesktop</span></a> is not ready for professional <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/mediaproduction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>mediaproduction</span></a> and this is such a bad thing in times like this. </p><p><a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/davinciresolve" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>davinciresolve</span></a> also barely runs on everything except nvidia on <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>linux</span></a> and still has no <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/flatpak" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>flatpak</span></a></p><p>Even blender is a pain with amd <a href="https://social.linux.pizza/tags/rocm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>rocm</span></a></p>
Janne Moren<p>Any <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Linux</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/kernel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>kernel</span></a> ,<br> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/graphics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>graphics</span></a> or <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/GPU" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GPU</span></a> people out there? </p><p>I'm trying to understand the relationship between the <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/amgdpu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>amgdpu</span></a> driver shipped with the kernel; and the "andgpu-dkms" driver that comes with <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/ROCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCm</span></a> . </p><p>Specifically, with a recent enough kernel, do we really need to install the ROCm version of the driver? Does the ROCm version contain stuff the general driver does not? Or is the ROCm stack (esp. libhsa) tightly tied to a very specific version of the driver?</p>
Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬<p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> splits <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/ROCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCm</span></a> toolkit into two parts – ROCm <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/AMDGPU" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMDGPU</span></a> drivers get their own branch under Instinct <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/datacenter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>datacenter</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/GPU" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GPU</span></a> moniker<br>The new <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/datacenter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>datacenter</span></a> Instinct driver is a renamed version of the <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Linux</span></a> AMDGPU driver packages that are already distributed and documented with ROCm. Previously, everything related to ROCm (including the amdgpu driver) existed as part of the ROCm software stack. <br><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/amd-splits-rocm-toolkit-into-two-parts-rocm-amdgpu-drivers-get-their-own-branch-under-instinct-datacenter-gpu-moniker" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">tomshardware.com/pc-components</span><span class="invisible">/gpus/amd-splits-rocm-toolkit-into-two-parts-rocm-amdgpu-drivers-get-their-own-branch-under-instinct-datacenter-gpu-moniker</span></a></p>
Natasha Nox 🇺🇦🇵🇸<p>ffs, why does their docker only support Navi 31 and not Navi 32? 😩 <br><a href="https://hub.docker.com/r/rocm/pytorch" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">hub.docker.com/r/rocm/pytorch</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>I just wish both <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Nvidia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Nvidia</span></a> and <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> would stop with that whole licensing bullshit around <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/CUDA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CUDA</span></a> and <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/ROCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCm</span></a> and just include that damn stuff in the default driver.<br>I just want to run <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Codestral" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Codestral</span></a> on my local machine so I can use it with non-public code. Will be troublesome enough to cram it into 16gb VRAM. 😑 <br><a href="https://chaos.social/tags/computer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>computer</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Linux</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a></p>
ℒӱḏɩę :blahaj:<p>The B-17 Bomber was amazing and helped win WWII. I flew on one in 2002 as a tourist - I have family members that were ball turret gunners - bad place to be.</p><p>This video was shot on Hi-8, and thankfully I digitized it (at 720x480) way back in that day. Now, I've up-scaled it with local AI (1408x954) and the improvement is astounding.</p><p>Sadly, this actual B17 crashed in 2019: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Boeing_B-17_Flying_Fortress_crash" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Boe</span><span class="invisible">ing_B-17_Flying_Fortress_crash</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/localai" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>localai</span></a><br><a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/stablediffusion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>stablediffusion</span></a><br><a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/rocm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>rocm</span></a><br><a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/amd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>amd</span></a><br><a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/b17" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>b17</span></a><br><a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/flyingfortress" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>flyingfortress</span></a></p>
ℒӱḏɩę :blahaj:<p>Dear <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a>: Can we have a desktop AI processor like nVidia is making? A big arse <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/ROCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCm</span></a> <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/MI325X" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MI325X</span></a> processor would be Epyc.</p>
Gilberto Ficara<p>Published another article about <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/Darktable" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Darktable</span></a> with <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/OpenCL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenCL</span></a> for <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/ROCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCm</span></a> on <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/Debian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Debian</span></a> (SID)... I finally got it working (again) :)</p><p><a href="https://www.stranatesta.eu/tech/darktable-opencl-debian-sid-december-2024/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">stranatesta.eu/tech/darktable-</span><span class="invisible">opencl-debian-sid-december-2024/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>linux</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/amdgpu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>amdgpu</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/gpu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>gpu</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.art/tags/photography" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>photography</span></a></p>
Maxi 10x 💉<p>Interessanter Forenbeitrag zum Geschehen rund um <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/CUDA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CUDA</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/RoCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RoCm</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/HIP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HIP</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/oneAPI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>oneAPI</span></a> … und der Wettbewerbssituation mit <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/Nvidia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Nvidia</span></a>:</p><p><a href="https://www.heise.de/forum/heise-online/Kommentare/Der-erste-Dominostein-gegen-Nvidias-Dominanz-Frankreich-prescht-gegen-CUDA/Low-Level-Programming/thread-7603684/#posting_44165749" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">heise.de/forum/heise-online/Ko</span><span class="invisible">mmentare/Der-erste-Dominostein-gegen-Nvidias-Dominanz-Frankreich-prescht-gegen-CUDA/Low-Level-Programming/thread-7603684/#posting_44165749</span></a></p><p>Eine Replik:</p><p><a href="https://www.heise.de/forum/heise-online/Kommentare/Der-erste-Dominostein-gegen-Nvidias-Dominanz-Frankreich-prescht-gegen-CUDA/Low-Level-Programming/thread-7603684/page-2/#posting_44166110" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">heise.de/forum/heise-online/Ko</span><span class="invisible">mmentare/Der-erste-Dominostein-gegen-Nvidias-Dominanz-Frankreich-prescht-gegen-CUDA/Low-Level-Programming/thread-7603684/page-2/#posting_44166110</span></a></p>
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven<p>AMD released ROCm 6.1.0</p><p><a href="https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm/releases/tag/rocm-6.1.0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">github.com/ROCm/ROCm/releases/</span><span class="invisible">tag/rocm-6.1.0</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ROCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCm</span></a></p>
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven<p>AMD Working To Release MES Documentation &amp; Source Code</p><p>"[..], AMD now says they will be releasing documentation followed by the source code for their Micro-Engine Scheduler (MES) IP block found within Radeon GPUs."</p><p>Note: towards the end of May</p><p><a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMD-MES-Docs-And-Source-Code" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">phoronix.com/news/AMD-MES-Docs</span><span class="invisible">-And-Source-Code</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MES" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MES</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Firmware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Firmware</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Documentation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Documentation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ROCm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCm</span></a></p>
FCLC<p>People running 7900 XTX cards under Linux: what’s the state of ROCm like for you? </p><p>Installs at all? </p><p>Installs and runs examples? </p><p>Toy programs? </p><p>Real programs? </p><p><a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/HPC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HPC</span></a> <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/HIP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HIP</span></a> <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/ROCM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ROCM</span></a></p>