eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

205
active users

#fourteenthamendment

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Heather Cox Richardson's analysis of the Supreme Court’s **Trump v. CASA** decision raises critical questions about birthright citizenship. As Trump inaccurately links this right to a mythologized history, Richardson clarifies that the **Fourteenth Amendment** was established to protect the rights of former slaves after the **Civil War**. The article delves into America's legacy of racial discrimination in citizenship. Explore how these issues resonate today: presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/ #BirthrightCitizenship #CivilRights #FourteenthAmendment

www.presidency.ucsb.eduRepublican Party Platform of 1860 | The American Presidency Project

A bill that would restrict Texas land sales to people connected with the governments of China, Iran, North Korea and Russia is heading for Gov. Greg Abbott's desk. If he signs the measure into law, it could lead to a swift legal challenge.

houstonpublicmedia.org/article

Houston Public Media · Bill restricting Texas land sales to people from some foreign countries on verge of becoming lawBy Andrew Schneider
Continued thread

#SCOTUS in #NYTvSullivan & subsequent decisions set a standard that in order to win a #libel suit, a public figure must demonstrate the offending statement was made w/ "actual malice," meaning w/ knowledge it was false or with reckless disregard as to whether it was false.

That standard has since been adopted in a number of state laws across the country, including in Nevada.

Federal district court judge temporarily blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order

Excerpt: "I’ve been on the bench for over four decades," Coughenour, a Ronald Reagan appointee, said. "I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order."

"I’ve been on the bench for over four decades," Coughenour, a Ronald Reagan appointee, said. "I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order."

Sharing as the incoming emperor apparently hasn't read the #Constituion.

Amendment XIV
Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Continued thread

A lifetime appointment means that #SupremeCourt justices can do whatever they wish when they are in the majority. When the justices wanted to force #Colorado to return #Trump to its presidential #ballot after the state concluded that his attempted seizure of #power on #Jan6 barred him from holding office under the #FourteenthAmendment, they moved as rapidly as possible. When they wanted to assist Trump’s strategy of delaying any possible federal trial, they took their time.