eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

239
active users

#references

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Continued thread

6/
#References

[1] Stallman, R.M., 2011. Measures governments can use to promote free software. Free Software Foundation. gnu.org/philosophy/government-

[2] Stallman, R.M., 2013. Why free software is more important now than ever before. Wired 2013 (9). web.archive.org/web/2014040223

[3] Stallman, R.M., 2009. Viewpoint: why “open source” misses the point of free software. Communications of the ACM 52, 31–33. doi.org/10.1145/1516046.151605
(free access version: gnu.org/philosophy/open-source )

www.gnu.orgMeasures Governments Can Use to Promote Free Software - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
Continued thread

Went to #arXiv to check… and found it's w... more advanced.

They partner with this #txyz company which claims in one interview that "If you find the article, you do not have to read it. Our system will generate a summary for you, and if you have any questions, you simply ask our #AI, and it will answer all of them, with fact-based #references, of course." (not posting the link, it's a trash journal - #TheGlobeAndMail also has a promotional paper about it).

theglobeandmail.com/investing/

The Globe and MailIntroducing TXYZ: The AI Platform Revolutionizing PDF Reading and Writing for AcademicGlobe PR Wire Press Release.

"Beware of robots generating your references. They could very well take it upon themselves to lie on your behalf.

[ ... ]

I _did_ write The Book of PF. (...) However, the three titles that followed were *not* written by me."

Read on in "Those Titles the AI Bot Thought I Had Written" nxdomain.no/~peter/those_title and comment here ->

nxdomain.noThose Titles the AI Bot Thought I Had Written
#ai#genai#copyright
Continued thread

14/

#References

[7] Else, H., 2024. ‘Systematic reviews’ that aim to extract broad conclusions from many studies are in peril. Science 386 (6725), 955. doi.org/10.1126/science.zpnivp

[8] Berrío, J.P., Kalliokoski, O., 2024. Fraudulent studies are undermining the reliability of systematic reviews – A study of the prevalence of problematic images in preclinical studies of depression. bioRxiv 580196+. doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.13.580

Continued thread

5/

#References

[1] Shapiro, A.R., 2017. News flash: science has always been political. In: Macroscope, American Scientist. Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society, p. 3906+. americanscientist.org/node/390

[2] Brecht, B., The Life of Galileo (orig. "Leben des Galilei")
(mentioned excerpts: e.g. see
- archive.org/details/LifeOfGali
- archive.org/details/LifeOfGali )

[3] Fuentes, A., 2024. Scientists as political advocates. Science 386 (6724), eadt7194+. doi.org/10.1126/science.adt719

#DOI
@tryingbiology

Continued thread

13/

#References

[4] Teixeira Da Silva, J.A., Nazarovets, M., 2023. Archiving website‐based references in academic papers: problems caused by reference rot, potential solutions and limitations. Learned Publishing 36 (3), 477-487. doi.org/10.1002/leap.1560
(free access versions: scholar.google.com/scholar?clu )

[5] Cerf, V.G., 2016. “We’re going backward!” Communication of the ACM 59 (10), 7. doi.org/10.1145/2993746
(#PDF: dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/299)