eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

242
active users

#scienceethics

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@allochthonous yes, I also observe this regularly, and these uncorrect citations spread. Makes me desperate about the state of science, or more specifically about higher science education : how to cite properly should be part of any masters and doctorate programme, and especially PhD Nd post-doc supervisors have the responsability to check the refs their students cite and teach them how to do it correctly.
#ScienceEthics

Continued thread

14/

#References

[7] Else, H., 2024. ‘Systematic reviews’ that aim to extract broad conclusions from many studies are in peril. Science 386 (6725), 955. doi.org/10.1126/science.zpnivp

[8] Berrío, J.P., Kalliokoski, O., 2024. Fraudulent studies are undermining the reliability of systematic reviews – A study of the prevalence of problematic images in preclinical studies of depression. bioRxiv 580196+. doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.13.580

📢 NEW STATEMENT ALERT!

In conjunction with , ALLEA released a statement on how we can shape a scientifically literate and society.

The statement advocates for expanding early science education curricula to include both & pedagogies on how to do that.

Find the full statement 👉allea.org/portfolio-item/allea

, , , , , ,