I've had concerns for a while about the direction the #OSI has been going with AI for a while. The publishing of the #OSAID weakens the #OpenSourceDefinition.
I'm not a member but the definition does require community participation in terms of the licences we choose and how we advocate for Open Source.
The recent board elections showed a disturbing pattern of obfuscation. We need to be able to trust Organisations that are meant to safeguard what Open source is.
Interesting thread about EDPB opinion on AI and building LLMs on folks posts.
I feel the @osi should have considered these things with their broken #OpenAI definition that undermines the #OpenSourceDefinition
But being in such a rush to define it, I suppose stuff like meaningful consent gets in the way of projects like #OpenAI goals.
I'm never going to forgive the OSI for doing that. There was time, it would have been better to insist the training models be open.
