Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Administered by:

Server stats:

241
active users

eupolicy.social: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.6

Public
Ian Brown 👨🏻‍💻

I can see the ability to use other messaging apps to communicate with users within the EU (thanks to the ) is going to become popular quickly, once and others have finished implementing it…
From: @alderik
eupolicy.social/@alderik/11424

Public
Sebastian "spaetz" Spaeth

@1br0wn @alderik From what I have gathered, WhatsApp is being so anal about the #DMA that I would not bet on that interoperability working anytime soon.

Public
Sebastian "spaetz" Spaeth

@1br0wn @alderik For one thing, each Homeserver would need to sign a separate contract with them. So even if *:matrix.org addresses could DM WhatsApp users, I, using a different Homeserver could not. And we are only talking about direct messages, group chats would not work anyway because they are not mandated. Ahh, and it would only work for people living in the EU, because WhatsApp can ignore the rest of the world.

Public
Ian Brown 👨🏻‍💻

@spaetz @1br0wn @alderik Your first and third points are indeed problematic and the EC should challenge them. Limited group support does come though in the second and third stages of Art. 7, 2 and 4 years after designation

Ian Brown 👨🏻‍💻

@spaetz @1br0wn @alderik A big problem is the EC has been against Art. 7 all along. It’s only in the because the EuroParl fought so hard for it. So I don’t think the EC really cares if WA suffocates it 🤷‍♂️

Mar 29, 2025, 09:58 PM·Public·openvibe
0boosts·1favorite
ExploreLive feeds
About