Recent searches
Search options
@1br0wn@eupolicy.socialThe European Commission needs to do *better* than this on designating #NIICS. Same reason apparently #gmail has not been designated under the #DMA (which is *not* competition law; but gmail market share is a serious sign something is wrong in market fairness and contestability). And then of course there is the infamous EC acceptance of #Apple’s rebuttal of #iMessage designation 
/cc @mnot
From: @nemobis
https://mamot.fr/@nemobis/114148782940953560
Mamot - Le Mastodon de La Quadrature du Net Nemo_bis 🌈 (@nemobis@mamot.fr)Attached: 1 image
@mrchrisadams@mastodon.social Hmm.
https://element.io/blog/ems-launches-bridging-for-microsoft-teams/
https://element.io/blog/ems-launches-fully-managed-matrix-bridging-for-whatsapp/
https://matrix.org/blog/2024/09/whatsapp-dma/
Can you use the MS Teams bridge to contact someone who has not opted into it? I suspect the answer is a resounding no at the moment. This *might* be ok if M$ also disabled messaging from "outside" users by default; currently you can get messages from any M$/Azure tenant (which can also be an infosec liability).
Cf. reasons to not list Outlook in the gatekeeper designation https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/551/oj
#DMA
@1br0wn Yeah it is utterly ridiculous that #Microsoft can be exempt from DMA requirements simply by doing puppy eyes "oh we are such a small player in the email space and we play nice with everyone, nobody ever has trouble delivering or collecting mail with us".