eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

227
active users

#summaries

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
eicker.news ᳇ tech news<p>»The <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/Bee" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Bee</span></a>, <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/Limitless" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Limitless</span></a> and <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/Plaud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Plaud</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/wearables" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>wearables</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/record" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>record</span></a> everything you say and use <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> to provide <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/summaries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>summaries</span></a>, to-do’s — and a slightly terrifying glimpse of the future.« <a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/personal-tech/ai-personal-assistant-wearable-tech-impressions-28156b57?eicker.news" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">wsj.com/tech/personal-tech/ai-</span><span class="invisible">personal-assistant-wearable-tech-impressions-28156b57?eicker.news</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tech</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/media" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>media</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/news" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>news</span></a></p>
stonehead<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@josephcox" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>josephcox</span></a></span> You're not the only one. This happens to most non-fiction bestsellers nowadays, and markets like Google Play Books don't seem to care at all. You could see it as a badge of honour that they chose to do this to your book at all.</p><p>During last year's Black Friday, I surprised myself with a cheap 1-year subscription to the Blinkist app, which sells 20-minute-summaries of non-fiction books as well, except that those are handmade. Once I checked out what it was, I started to feel uneasy about it. Blinkist isn't bad and it also isn't even wrong like this AI, but for a number of books that I read before and that I loved, Blinkist definitely leaves away from the summaries what made those books so super for me in the first place. </p><p>There's something evil and tasteless in the concept of <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/summaries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>summaries</span></a> itself. People should know better than to read them, let alone pay for them.</p>
eicker.news ᳇ tech news<p>»<a href="https://eicker.news/tags/AIplatforms" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AIplatforms</span></a> are built on <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/precision" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>precision</span></a> and <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/summaries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>summaries</span></a>. They’re unlikely to be a major source of traffic or advertising revenue.« <a href="https://om.co/2024/12/21/dark-musings-on-media-ai/?eicker.news" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">om.co/2024/12/21/dark-musings-</span><span class="invisible">on-media-ai/?eicker.news</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tech</span></a> <a href="https://eicker.news/tags/media" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>media</span></a></p>
Karl Voit :emacs: :orgmode:<p>"These reviewers overwhelmingly found that the human <a href="https://graz.social/tags/summaries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>summaries</span></a> beat out their <a href="https://graz.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> competitors on every criteria and on every submission, scoring an 81% on an internal rubric compared with the machine’s 47%."</p><p><a href="https://www.crikey.com.au/2024/09/03/ai-worse-summarising-information-humans-government-trial/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">crikey.com.au/2024/09/03/ai-wo</span><span class="invisible">rse-summarising-information-humans-government-trial/</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>28. Update. I've argued here that <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a>-generated <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/summaries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>summaries</span></a> needn't infringe the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/copyrights" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>copyrights</span></a> in the originals, even if some still do infringe. </p><p>AI companies are growing in confidence that they can now avoid that kind of infringement &amp; even indemnify users sued for it.<br><a href="https://techcrunch.com/2023/11/06/openai-promises-to-defend-business-customers-against-copyright-claims/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">techcrunch.com/2023/11/06/open</span><span class="invisible">ai-promises-to-defend-business-customers-against-copyright-claims/</span></a></p><p>"IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, Getty Images, Shutterstock &amp; Adobe are among those who’ve explicitly said they’ll indemnify generative AI customers over IP rights claims. Today, OpenAI joins that group."</p>
petersuber<p>1/ Here's a thought to advance <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> to research. If it has problems, I think they're worth solving. </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Paraphrases" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Paraphrases</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Summaries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Summaries</span></a></p><p>🧵</p>
petersuber<p>Update. I'm pulling a few other comments into this thread, in preparation for extending it later. </p><p>1. I have mixed feelings on <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/attribution" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>attribution</span></a> in peer review. I see the benefits, but I also see the benefits of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/anonymity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>anonymity</span></a>. <br><a href="https://twitter.com/petersuber/status/1412455826397204487" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">twitter.com/petersuber/status/</span><span class="invisible">1412455826397204487</span></a></p><p>2. For <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> today, good <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/reviews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>reviews</span></a> are a harder problem than good <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/summaries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>summaries</span></a>. <br><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109954904433171308" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">fediscience.org/@petersuber/10</span><span class="invisible">9954904433171308</span></a></p><p>3. Truth detection is a deep, hard problem. Automating it is even harder. <br><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109921214854932516" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">fediscience.org/@petersuber/10</span><span class="invisible">9921214854932516</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenPeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenPeerReview</span></a></p>