💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://dair-community.social/@emilymbender" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>emilymbender</span></a></span> <br>"it did not compare the A.I. with human performance" - as a <a href="https://dotnet.social/tags/Maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Maths</span></a> <a href="https://dotnet.social/tags/teacher" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>teacher</span></a> it bugs me no end when they DO compare the <a href="https://dotnet.social/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://dotnet.social/tags/Math" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Math</span></a> with humans ("it would've passed!"). A.I. is a <a href="https://dotnet.social/tags/computer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>computer</span></a> <a href="https://dotnet.social/tags/program" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>program</span></a>. We already have computer programs that are 100% correct with Maths - hand-held calculators come with them! If you're comparing it to humans then you're admitting it is flawed when it comes to doing <a href="https://dotnet.social/tags/Mathematics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mathematics</span></a>, not flawless like a Sharp calculator. It should be getting 100%! 😡</p>