Gilgwath<p><a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/hottake" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>hottake</span></a> <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/humaniod" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>humaniod</span></a> <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/robots" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>robots</span></a> are a nonsense idea. Why would we build a <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/robot" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>robot</span></a> that is a <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/technology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>technology</span></a> recreation of our own limited form, when we can build what ever we want suited to the environment and task. It seems to me that a box on wheeles/feet/tracks with the right manipulators on board will just be more efficient in 98% of cases. <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/robotics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>robotics</span></a> <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/human" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>human</span></a></p>