Daniel Lakeland<p><a href="https://aeon.co/essays/no-schrodingers-cat-is-not-alive-and-dead-at-the-same-time" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">aeon.co/essays/no-schrodingers</span><span class="invisible">-cat-is-not-alive-and-dead-at-the-same-time</span></a></p><p>This is a pretty good article for showing how confused the interpretation of QM is. And its a good article to understand why i personally side with Bohm and Bell in thinking the pilot wave theory is the one most reasonable to believe. Because the pilot wave theory has the following quality. The theory is a mapping from initial position at time t=0 to final position at time t=1...Its deterministic, but our knowledge of the initial condition is not<br><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/quantum" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>quantum</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/bohm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>bohm</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>bayesian</span></a></p>