Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Administered by:

Server stats:

218
active users

eupolicy.social: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.8

#advisors

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Public
Scientific Advice Mechanism

Do science advisors really sabotage themselves? 🤔

💡 Dr Christiane Gerblinger has one answer: her research suggests that adopt strategies to make themselves deliberately ignorable. Listen to her in our lates episode of podcast: sapea.info/podcast 🎧

Her Book How Government Experts Self-Sabotage: The language of the rebuffed. lnkd.in/ea4QfrMu

press.anu.edu.auHow Government Experts Self-SabotageAfter official policy advice to governments is publicly released, governments are often accused of ignoring or rejecting their experts. Commonly represented as politicisation, this depiction is superficial. Digging deeper, is there something about the official advice itself that makes it easy to ignore?
#podcast
Public
Scientific Advice Mechanism

Do science advisors really sabotage themselves? 🤔

When are employed by governments, how do they reconcile the competing needs to accurately convey the science, while ensuring it can be of maximum use in the current political context? 👇

💡 Dr Christiane Gerblinger has one answer: her research suggests that adopt strategies to make themselves deliberately ignorable.

Listen to her in our lates episode of podcast: sapea.info/podcast 🎧

ExploreLive feeds
About