eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

244
active users

#StrategicAutonomy

2 posts2 participants0 posts today
Continued thread

In fact, governments probably should only EVER deploy executables they have built themselves, using their own compilers (see the classic computer science paper Reflections on Trusting Trust).

You’d also need chip auditing and verification for security-critical systems. And some level of chip assurance. And 🇬🇧 Cell-like audits… Details to be determined 😉


I was talking to a colleague last week about what REAL would mean.

For software in critical infrastructure, I think it would include military hardware-like contractual provisions, requiring eg the full and of all source code, including for updates… and the right at any time for governments facing supply/continued operation threats to use that escrowed code to recreate their own versions of the software, and use them until the supply threats are removed.

Replied in thread

@anderspuck @Techaltar
RE
what it will take for #Europe to achieve #strategicautonomy

Thx, I will watch the video on #France attempting to change, but I saw this graph yesterday

France has a lot of US #TreasuryBonds

The #CaymanIslands and OTHERS have a lot too, just pointing this out, because it seerms #Trump #LiberationDay was stopped by the selling of T Bonds

@Lazarou thx for boost

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United