Jan Penfrat<p>Looks like we don't need laws after all for platforms to opportunistically suppress political user content: In 🇫🇷 <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/France" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>France</span></a>, a <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/Snapchat" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Snapchat</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/lobbyist" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>lobbyist</span></a> admitted in a parliamentary hearing that the company was "proud" to have collaborated "hand in hand with the interior ministry" to make sure only user content critical of the mass protests was shown on <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/SnapMaps" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>SnapMaps</span></a>. </p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.lesnumeriques.com/societe-numerique/snapchat-admet-avoir-bidonne-la-snap-map-pendant-les-emeutes-n211617.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">lesnumeriques.com/societe-nume</span><span class="invisible">rique/snapchat-admet-avoir-bidonne-la-snap-map-pendant-les-emeutes-n211617.html</span></a><br /><a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/centralisation" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>centralisation</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/contentmoderation" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>contentmoderation</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/DigitalServicesAct" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>DigitalServicesAct</span></a> <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/DSA" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>DSA</span></a></p>