Ingo Rohlfing<p>Finding the needle in the haystack: archival research in European political science <br><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41304-024-00488-3" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/article/10.1</span><span class="invisible">057/s41304-024-00488-3</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/methods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>methods</span></a><br>Work on <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ProcessTracing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ProcessTracing</span></a> primarily focused on philosophy of science, design and causal inference. This was all fine, but came at expense of focus on data collection.<br>It is good to see more and more articles on data collection in qualitatibe like 👆 that are concerned with practical challenges one is likely to confront</p>