Martin Nutty<p>Are liberals abandoning <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/BlueSky" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BlueSky</span></a> for <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/X" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>X</span></a>? </p><p>That’s what the headline reads in this <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/NewYorker" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NewYorker</span></a> article which forces the reader to consume <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/NateSilver" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NateSilver</span></a> musings before approaching the headline subject</p><p>Alternative <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/SocialMedia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SocialMedia</span></a> such as BlueSky or <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> has seen a decline in posting volume following an initial anti <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/Twitter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Twitter</span></a> surge</p><p>The big question is why many liberals remained or have chosen to return to X given <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/Musk" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Musk</span></a> toxicity. Is it simply the <a href="https://mastodon.ie/tags/NetworkEffect" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NetworkEffect</span></a>?</p><p><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/social-media-is-navigating-its-sectarian-phase" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">newyorker.com/culture/infinite</span><span class="invisible">-scroll/social-media-is-navigating-its-sectarian-phase</span></a></p>