Daniele de Rigo<p>4/</p><p>The "2023 <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/temperature" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>temperature</span></a> <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/anomaly" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>anomaly</span></a> has come out of the blue, revealing an unprecedented <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/KnowledgeGap" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>KnowledgeGap</span></a> perhaps for the first time since about 40 years ago [...] If the anomaly does not stabilize by August — a reasonable expectation based on previous <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/ElNi%C3%B1o" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ElNiño</span></a> events — then the world will be in uncharted territory" [1]</p><p><a href="https://hostux.social/tags/References" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>References</span></a></p><p>[1] Schmidt, G., 2024. Climate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly — we could be in uncharted territory. Nature 627 (8004), 467. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00816-z" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-008</span><span class="invisible">16-z</span></a></p><p><a href="https://hostux.social/tags/DOI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DOI</span></a></p>