David Haigh<p>In my STEM studies, the content is typically objective, factual, mechanical, and devoid of humanity.</p><p>More recently, first through <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/leanthinking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>leanthinking</span></a>, and then into <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/agile" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>agile</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/systemsthinking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>systemsthinking</span></a>, <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/industrialengineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>industrialengineering</span></a>, I've come to realize that engineering with humanity creates progress for everyone, for the long term.</p><p>Thinkers like Galbraith, Follett, and Matthews show us a fair path, showing the bigger picture and putting humanity over profits.</p><p>IMHO, <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://saturation.social/@debcha" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>debcha</span></a></span> belongs in that same pantheon.</p><p>1/</p>