AnneTheWriter<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://tootsweet.social/@annewalk" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>annewalk</span></a></span> <br>🧵2/X<br>As for the issue of using <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/Grammarly" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Grammarly</span></a> vs <a href="https://universeodon.com/tags/ChatGPT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ChatGPT</span></a> :</p><p>Think of the process of making a wedding gown.</p><p>The Seamstress measures the bride, designs the gown, draws & cuts out the paper pattern, chooses the materials, cuts out the fabric, sews it all together, then tailors it for the bride. </p><p>If robots were to make the gown-- drawing out the design, cutting fabric, etc.-- then she would not be a “Seamstress.” She would NOT be an artist, she would merely be using a machine, the same way you use a toaster. (This is the equivalent of generative AI, which draws & writes everything based on prompts, while the prompter does none of the actual work.)</p><p>But the Seamstress makes the gown. Yes, she uses a sewing machine, but the majority of the hard work is her own. (Similarly, programs like Grammarly use a form of AI, but the writer/artist who uses them is like the Seamstress who uses a sewing machine: Those are merely tools to help the writer, and the writer does all the actual work.)</p>