eupolicy.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This Mastodon server is a friendly and respectful discussion space for people working in areas related to EU policy. When you request to create an account, please tell us something about you.

Server stats:

219
active users

#antitrust

15 posts15 participants0 posts today

Ars Technica: Threat of Meta breakup looms as FTC’s monopoly trial ends. “As alleged by the FTC, Meta’s internal emails laid bare that Meta’s motive in acquiring both Instagram and WhatsApp was to pay whatever it took to snuff out dominant rivals threatening to lure users away from Facebook—Mark Zuckerberg’s jewel.”

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/05/31/ars-technica-threat-of-meta-breakup-looms-as-ftcs-monopoly-trial-ends/

"The nation's three largest airlines have begun charging some solo travelers higher fares than groups of two travelers or more.

It's not a widespread phenomenon – currently, we're only seeing it on a handful of one-way domestic flights. And it's unclear whether whether this began just recently or weeks, even months ago. Maybe airlines are testing this new pricing tactic out on a smaller scale before expanding.

We don't know. But we can say one thing for sure: Solo travelers – whether they're flying on a corporate account or not – will be the ones who pay the price."

thriftytraveler.com/news/airli

four american airlines jets parked at gates
Thrifty Traveler · Exclusive: US Airlines Are Quietly Hitting Solo & Biz Travelers with Higher FaresIt's not just Delta. The country's three largest airlines are charging some solo travelers higher fares than groups of two or more.

"Google isn’t satisfied with its monopoly on the questions we search.

Google wants to use AI to monopolize the very answers themselves.

As one Google executive recently explained: “Organizing information is clearly a trillion-dollar opportunity, but a trillion dollars is not cool anymore. What’s cool is a quadrillion dollars.”

Google plans to use AI to consume and replace the open web.

I believe demolishing independent sites like mine was Google’s first step in clearing ground so it has space to rebuild search from the ground up for an “AI-first” future.

Google envisions a future where “Google does the Googling for you,” its AI and ads do the answering – and users never need to leave Google.

Google will just source information from a handful of sources and partner websites that it controls and selects – effectively creating an information cartel.

If Google can use AI to censor a travel website from the web arbitrarily and without opportunity for appeal – it can do the same to any source of information it wants.

And American citizens and Internet users everywhere will be worse off for it.

So while you may not really care about the plight of some random travel website getting censored, everyone should care about the way Google is deploying AI to build a censorship cartel that lets it control the flow of information online.

What follows is a lengthy summary of my experiences and my opinions as an independent publisher trying to survive in a monopolist’s information economy.

To start, let me explain how we got to this point where Google has the power to do this:"

travellemming.com/perspectives

A graphic showing the Travel Lemming's search traffic in Google Search Console
Travel Lemming · Google is Using AI to Censor Independent WebsitesMy letter to the FTC explaining how Google is using AI to censor thousands of independent websites - and to control the flow of information online.

#Google #Rumble #antitrust #legal

'A federal judge has dismissed conservative video platform Rumble's claims that Google violated antitrust law by allegedly promoting YouTube in the search results, and by installing YouTube on Android devices.

In a ruling issued last week, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam, Jr. in the Northern District of California said Rumble's lawsuit, brought in January 2021, fell outside antitrust law's four-year statute of limitations.'

mediapost.com/publications/art

www.mediapost.comGoogle Defeats Rumble Antitrust SuitConservative video platform Rumble's antitrust claims against Google fell outside the four-year statute of limitations, a federal judge ruled.

MediaPost: Google Defeats Rumble Antitrust Suit . “A federal judge has dismissed conservative video platform Rumble’s claims that Google violated antitrust law by allegedly promoting YouTube in the search results, and by installing YouTube on Android devices. In a ruling issued last week, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam, Jr. in the Northern District of California said Rumble’s […]

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/05/28/mediapost-google-defeats-rumble-antitrust-suit/

ResearchBuzz: Firehose | Individual posts from ResearchBuzz · MediaPost: Google Defeats Rumble Antitrust Suit | ResearchBuzz: Firehose
More from ResearchBuzz: Firehose

Microsoft filed an amicus brief in support of Epic Games’ ongoing fight with Apple’s control over the App Store. The brief takes issue with Apple’s attempt to overturn the injunction that allows Epic and other developers to freely advertise alternative payment methods in their apps. Read more at @theverge. #Microsoft #Apple #Epic #AppStore #Antitrust #Tech #Technology flip.it/NFlhNi

Xbox logo illustration
The Verge · Microsoft blames Apple for its delayed Xbox mobile storeBy Tom Warren

"In the 1960s and 1970s, a group of Chicago School economists conceived of an absurd new way to interpret competition law, which they called "the consumer welfare standard." Under this standard, the job of competition policy was to encourage monopolies to form, on the grounds that monopolies were "efficient" and would lower prices for "consumers."

The chief proponent of this standard was Robert Bork, a virulent racist whose most significant claim to fame was that he was the only government lawyer willing to help Richard Nixon illegally fire officials who wouldn't turn a blind eye to his crimes. Bork's long record of unethical behavior and scorching bigotry came back to bite him in the ass when Ronald Reagan tried to seat him on the Supreme Court, during a confirmation hearing that Bork screwed up so badly that even today, we use "borked" as a synonym for anything that is utterly fucked.

But Bork's real legacy was as a pro-monopoly propagandist, whose work helped shift how judges, government enforcers, and economists viewed antitrust law. Bork approached the text of America's antitrust laws, like the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act, with the same techniques as a Qanon follower addressing a Q "drop," applying gnostic techniques to find in these laws mystical coded language that – he asserted – meant that Congress had intended for America's anti-monopoly laws to actually support monopolies.

In episode three, we explore Bork's legacy, and how it led to what Tom Eastman calls the internet of "five giant websites, each filled with screenshots of the other four." We got great interviews and old tape for this one, including Michael Wiesel, a Canadian soap-maker who created a bestselling line of nontoxic lip-balm kits for kids, only to have Amazon shaft him by underselling him with his own product."

pluralistic.net/2025/05/19/kha

pluralistic.netPluralistic: Who Broke the Internet? Part III (19 May 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
Continued thread

Anyway Episode 3 of CBC 's Understood - Who Broke the Internet with @pluralistic goes deep into the shittiness of Amazon and has an interesting overview of #antitrust. Also Lina Khan!

cbc.ca/listen/cbc-podcasts/135

CBC ListenUnderstood | CBC Podcasts | CBC Listen Host Cory Doctorow coined the word "enshittification" to describe the state of the modern internet: a broken down, decaying place, once full of promise, now overrun with intrusive ads, hateful trolls, aggressive algorithms, zero privacy, and AI-generated slop, with every billionaire tech titan in a race to the bottom to bleed their users and their customers alike. It can feel like it was inevitable — but it didn't have to be this way.The modern internet is the result of decisions made by powerful people, at key moments in history, despite repeated warnings about where it would lead. In Understood: Who Broke the Internet?, Doctorow traces the downward spiral from the heady days of '90s tech-optimism through to today's rotten "enshitternet." You'll meet everyone from visionaries to villains to regular people just trying to survive in today's online world. And you'll discover who broke the internet — and, more importantly, a plan to fix it.  Know more, now. Understood is an anthology podcast that takes you out of the daily news cycle and inside the events, people, and cultural moments you want to know more about. Over a handful of episodes, each season unfolds as a story, hosted by a well-connected reporter, and rooted in journalism you can trust. Driven by insight and fueled by curiosity…The stories of our time: Understood. Season 1 - The Naked Emperor: the rise and fall of bitcoin king Sam Bankman-Fried. Season 2 - The Pornhub Empire: the story of how a Montreal-founded company came to dominate the adult industry. Season 3 - Modi’s India: how one man rose from poverty to the peak of political power. Season 4 - Céline: the surprising cultural, political and business alchemy that created a superstar. Season 5 - Who Broke the Internet? The internet sucks now, and it happened on purpose.

Engadget: Meta is trying to get its antitrust case thrown out in the middle of the trial. “The FTC just rested its case following weeks of testimony in a landmark antitrust case against Meta. But before Meta can begin its defense, the company’s lawyers have opted for another move: asking the judge to throw out the case entirely.”

https://rbfirehose.com/2025/05/18/engadget-meta-is-trying-to-get-its-antitrust-case-thrown-out-in-the-middle-of-the-trial/

ResearchBuzz: Firehose | Individual posts from ResearchBuzz · Engadget: Meta is trying to get its antitrust case thrown out in the middle of the trial | ResearchBuzz: Firehose
More from ResearchBuzz: Firehose